Yamaha R15 vs Yamaha R15 2.0 - A constant version
     Follow us on 
BS Motoring Web  
  Wednesday, May 23, 2012
 
HomeCarsBikesTravelGalleryBlogsMagazineWeb TVAbout us
  Tests    Reviews    News    Features    Motorsports    Motor shows    Classics    Quick Comparisons
 
Home Bikes Review
Yamaha R15 vs Yamaha R15 2.0 - A constant version
It’s difficult to make a good thing better. We pit the new R15 against the old one to find out
By : Kyle Pereira | Published : December 26, 2011
Email Print [2] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter  
More Photos | Video
Motorcyclists can be a curious lot. We will clothe our children in rags, skip a couple of meals every day, give the missus our business card for our wedding anniversary and do all this in a heart beat just to be able to get that one motorcycle into the garage. So naturally, after hearing news about the launch of an R15 replacement, our kids instantly resembled Victorian urchins, we went on a diet and the wife started filing divorce papers. Tasty rumours flew this way and that and were spicy enough to include words like ‘250 cc’, 26 bhp and ABS, among others.

 

 

So is this new R15 really all of that? Well, for one, it does not displace a quarter of a litre, nor does it put out anything even remotely close to 26 bhp. But it does sport some new styling updates, wears a fatter rear tyre (I can already hear somebody in the crowd shout ‘hurray’) and the rear swing arm is now a beefy looking aluminium unit. It was only fitting, then, that we put Version 2.0 against its forbear to see whether this time around, the change was evolution and not regression.

MORE ON PAGE 2>>

Pages :| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
More Photos:
    
Advertisements
Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
Invest in Real Estate. Villas in Bangalore starting @ Rs.66 lacs
One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Email Print [2] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter    
blog comments powered by Disqus
  Posted by AJ at 12th February,2012
I own a v2.0, run-in 450kms as of now. Haven't ridden the v1. But in some posts at xBhp forums, I read owners of v1 remarking that "the engine needed to be revved around 7k rpm even in the 1st and 2nd gears to get things going and that in steep uphill climbs this bothered them a bit". And that the v1 "didn't really pull nicely in 4th gear at 3.5k rpm, for example" which forced more shifts. Comparing to these data, I can vouch for the fact that it's so much better now. There's definitely a LOT more low-end torque. It cooperates without complaints, in those tight city stretches, without compromising all-out performance higher up the revs. This is nothing against the value of v1, but to point out something that would be a great improvement included in the v2. Thanks.
  Posted by ankit at 27th December,2011
well written & good dissection!!!!! i rode my friend V2.0 and still feel V1.0 is much bettter, guess he cant beat me on his newer one on head-to-head duel
Twitter
Follow BSMotoring on Twitter
Read Emailed Commented
Other Manufacturers Other Models
 
Explore BSMOTORING.COM
  Home   Cars   Bikes   Gallery   General   Resources   Explore Group Network
 Quick Comparisons
 Road Tests
 Motofocus
 Motorsports
 Destinations
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Photo Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Wallpaper
 Travel
 Blogs
 Magazine
 About us
 Archives
 Register
 Feedback
 Archives
 Subscribe to Magazine
 Advertise with us
 Contact Us
 Business-standard.com
 bshindi.com
 Archives
 Livemarkets
 smartportfolio II