Who dares, wins!
     Follow us on 
BS Motoring Web  
  Wednesday, May 23, 2012
 
HomeCarsBikesTravelGalleryBlogsMagazineWeb TVAbout us
  Tests    Reviews    News    Features    Motorsports    Motor shows    Classics    Quick Comparisons
 
Home Cars Road Test
Who dares, wins!
Does the Maruti Suzuki Ritz run rings around the segment best?
By : ROHIN NAGRANI | Published : July 18, 2009
Email Print [9] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter  
More Photos | Video
POWERTRAIN AND PERFORMANCE
It’s the battle of the Ks. The i10’s Kappa versus the Ritz’ K12 M. Both are pretty high-tech units, with stuff like hydraulic lash adjusters, twin-overhead cams, aluminium construction et al. These smart engines not only claim to produce good power for their small capacity, they also tend to produce better torque over the rev range. While the 1197cc i10 produces 78.8
bhp@5200 rpm, the Ritz produces 84 bhp@6000 rpm, thus pulling no punches on the power front.

Both produce identical peak torque of 11.4 kgm, with the i10’s curve starting at 4000 rpm while the Ritz starts at 4500 rpm. Then, when one gets to read the power to weight and torque to weight columns, the Ritz starts to lose heavily. The extra pork and stuffing on the Ritz means it weighs a full 170 kg more than the i10 on test here. And that translates into quicker acceleration times for the i10 as it gets off the blocks.
Take any aspect of  performance and the i10 just nudges the Ritz to the back of the field. Both cars take off reasonably quickly, but it’s the i10 that surges ahead. Zero to 60 kph comes up a second quicker in the i10 at 5.3 seconds, while the gap grows to one and a half seconds to the tonne. Passing speeds are identical, but at the top end, it’s the i10 that is quicker. The i10 also brakes quicker, utilising less space, but the Ritz is the one that feels more planted while doing so and there’s also less drama.

It’s on the driveability factor that the Ritz comes up trumps. Despite the slower times, the Ritz feels less lumpy and the production of torque lower down and gear ratios make it a better driver around town. The engine on the Ritz also feels more refined and NVH is better too. Both have a positive action to their gearboxes, with the i10 clicking into place and the Ritz delivering a little less feel while doing so. Both came back with similar fuel consumption figures. The i10 isn’t as efficient in the city, but it turns the tables on the Ritz on the highway. Eventually, the Ritz falls short, but by a very small margin.
Maruti Suzuki Ritz: 4 star
Hyundai i10: 4 stars

RIDE AND HANDLING
The Swift is an excellent platform for a good handling car. And that translates on the Ritz as well. Despite a higher roofline than the i10, the Ritz compensates with a wider front and rear track. Around a winding course, both cars exhibit roll, with the Ritz just that mite better. The turn-in on the i10 is quicker, thanks to its lighter mass and quicker turning steering that gives out decent feel. The steering on the Ritz feels heavier in comparison but has more feel and therefore tends to give you a better idea of the road curvature. But it lacks the outright agility of the i10 and therefore won’t win urban traffic races.

It’s the Ritz that uses its better body control to win the contest in the ride department. The i10 can feel like a yo-yo once you get into triple digit speeds, while the Ritz exhibits a very planted feel. At very low speeds, the i10 feels pretty decent while the Ritz can tend to thud around. Though once the speedo needle starts to climb, the Ritz feels surefooted and transmits less of the vertical oscillations to the occupants. It feels like a car that’s a class larger and that alone can inspire a driver to push the car harder.

Maruti Suzuki Ritz:4 star
Hyundai i10: 3 star

 

VERDICT
You see, it’s very hard to go wrong with either car. Both offer pretty good value and won’t give you much trouble over extended use, so even if you choose one over the other, you really won’t be called a nitwit. The i10 is a quality hatch that has proven its credentials and is a fun car to drive, even though it’s a touch short on space and doesn’t necessarily ride the best here. It has the go to match the show and really doesn’t put a foot wrong. It set the benchmark when it first arrived, but it seems that benchmark has moved forward.

The Ritz is a touch short in the quality department and the performance is a bit short of the small Hyundai. Those seem to be the only two points working against it. Otherwise, the Ritz is an accomplished performer in every other area. It feels and drives like a larger car. It rides like one and handles like one. There’s decent  space on the inside too and with Maruti’s service backup, it offers that little extra peace of mind. The overall feel-good factor is stronger with the Ritz and can’t be ignored. That, and the fact that it has moved a full two steps up on the Wagon R, makes it our winner here.

Pages :| 1 | 2 | 3 
More Photos:
  
Advertisements
Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
Invest in Real Estate. Villas in Bangalore starting @ Rs.66 lacs
One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Email Print [9] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter    
blog comments powered by Disqus
  Posted by ajay at 21st January,2011
all frnds check plz.. i10 wheelbase (mm):2380, ritz wheelbase (mm): 2360...thick
  Posted by Vijay at 11th August,2010
Why are we all trying to quarrel like cats and dogs?? If i20,Ritz,Swift,Polo,Jazz and Punto are considered are super hatches by the manufacturers, let that be. i10,Wagon R,Beat and Figo will fall in the Hatch segment. You also have Santro,Alto K10 etc a notch below that. Let's understand that i10 is not considered a super hatch by even their manufacturer, Hyundai. It is a much smaller car to be considered a super hatch.
  Posted by Tejus at 7th November,2009
Rohin, just one question. Why hasn't BSM done a proper road test of the Ritz? Only first drives and comparisons are here so far.
  Posted by Rohin Nagrani at 4th November,2009
Hi Velutha, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, the i10 sells more than the A-Star in India, and am not even trying to contest that. As for buying the Wagon R, yes Motoring journos make bad decisions at times. Especially in early 2005, when the only other option was the Hyundai Santro Xing. If I did have the i10, A-Star, Ritz, i20, Swift etc etc to also choose from, the story would have been very different.
  Posted by Velutha at 3rd November,2009
VELUTHA'S REVIEW-REVIEW "The A-Star has grabbed the collar of the base versions of the i10s" Not really, the A-Star's not even close to the i10, which manages a healthy 11,000 units every month. "as a current owner of a Wagon R" Aren't you ashamed of mentioning that? Pity that even a 'Motoring' journo would buy the worst car possible in its segment. STOP comparing it to the WagonR. This is a Ritz-i10 comparo! Good evaluation of Build Quality, Space & comfort, Powertrains n performance and Dynamics You ought to add the data from spec sheets while uploading stories on the web. Fuel efficiency figures were sorely missed here. Overall a very honest reveiw/comparo. Well done Review rating: 7/10
  Posted by Sourav at 18th August,2009
A very good and unbiased review,considering the pros of cons of both the models.Wagon-R is considered here as Splash (international version of Ritz) was conceptualised as a MPV and a step-ahead of Wagon-R in the Suzuki line of cars.No doublt that,i10 scores ahead in terms of internal finish and quality,but the ultimate asset of a car is its engine and also its ride & handling,where Ritz scores much higher.Interiors can be customized,but not the engine performance.Thus,Ritz would come out of as winner in any of these comparisons (with i10/i20)or similar line of cars in future also! fact is fact,and we all should accept it...
  Posted by Amarendra Singh at 24th July,2009
After writing 3 pages, you muddled everything in last paragraph. Is Wagon R is the benchmark of auto world? Where is BMW 300 in comparison to Wagon R? Ritz is such a powerful mover that it will not stop when you want it to stop. 80-0 for Ritz is 40 meters and 80-0 for i10 is 30 meters. Are you saying that if one survived Wagon R then Ritz will take care of your life.
  Posted by Nagendra at 19th July,2009
Rohin, I fail to understand your over exhuberence in trying to compare the Ritz with the i20! The feel good factor of the Ritz is confined largely to the car, where as the Hyundai has a far more satisfying customer service. Maruti desperately needs to improve on that front.
  Posted by Tejus at 4th August,2009
  Although the i10 is smaller when numbers are considered, it is the more spacious and roomy car here. Also, the Ritz is not path breaking as the Swift or i10. Agreed the engine is a marvel, but that does not alone make a small car complete. And please avoid the comparison of Ritz to i20, it has nowhere near the equipment level.
Twitter
Follow BSMotoring on Twitter
Read Emailed Commented
Other Manufacturers Other Models
 
Explore BSMOTORING.COM
  Home   Cars   Bikes   Gallery   General   Resources   Explore Group Network
 Quick Comparisons
 Road Tests
 Motofocus
 Motorsports
 Destinations
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Photo Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Wallpaper
 Travel
 Blogs
 Magazine
 About us
 Archives
 Register
 Feedback
 Archives
 Subscribe to Magazine
 Advertise with us
 Contact Us
 Business-standard.com
 bshindi.com
 Archives
 Livemarkets
 smartportfolio II