SUVs us right?
     Follow us on 
BS Motoring Web  
  Wednesday, May 23, 2012
 
HomeCarsBikesTravelGalleryBlogsMagazineWeb TVAbout us
 
 
Home Blog
SUVs us right?
By : Rohin Nagrani | Published : November 15, 2010
Email Print [17] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter  
More Photos | Video
I have to admit, I like Jairam Ramesh. Our Union Environment Minister likes to take on the establishment, tell them when they are wrong and deny industry a chance to make fat profits if he feels it is at the cost to the environment or the local populace. He is the kind of activist politician who probably has more enemies than friends, but doesn't blink when told so. But last week he made a statement that made my virtual Jairam Taj Mahal collapse like a pack of cards. He made the kind of statement that isn't exactly irresponsible, but ill-informed.

Am sure, you know what I am talking about - his take on SUVs. He says that SUVs in India are criminal. Fine, he's right, as long as his reference is limited to dubious politicos and criminals hopping on them. But oh no, he made a blanket statement and in just that one fell swoop he has made the entire middle and upper middle class take potshots at him on "the social networks, poll meters on news websites and even made the SIAM wear Kevlar layered Jairam proof vests.

So why do I think Jairam Ramesh is wrong? To begin with, the modern day SUV is designed to be more forgiving to the environment and the modern diesel engine has come a long way in becoming efficient, score far lower emissions and are overall less damaging to the environment than ever before. But aiming the shotgun on SUVs is easy, even seasoned western world politicans have made the mistake and have had to cower down to populist policies. But Mr Ramesh needs to know more.

The rising SUV culture in India is a result of two factors - growing Indian affluence and lack of credible roads beyond the highways and arterial roads of urban India. As the average Indian wallet gets fatter, so is his ambition to flaunt his wealth and we are doing it no differently from any of the other fast emerging economies nor are we doing it any different from the western world when their economic supremacy left us in awe. It is human nature to go for bigger, better, bolder cars when the times are good - it's simply because man feels if he can afford it then why not. Then, there's Indian infrastructure, which let us admit has yet to catch up with the pace of our automobilisation. Large families who were once stuck in cramped Omnis, archaic Ambassadors or tinny Sumos want to travel in comfort and not reach their destination feeling all sore - even that is basic human need Mr Ramesh. The market logic is that most sedans (note here most, not all) don't have the kind of ground clearance to tackle bad roads which SUVs do. If Mr Ramesh still has a problem with that, there is a Ministry of Surface Transport and Highways whose doors he should knock.

And as long as these two factors exist, people will buy SUVs. But if Mr Ramesh still wants to cleanse the system, then have his colleagues from the Ministry of Heavy Industries and his very own ministry offer sops for cleaner SUVs. After all, he would needs to know that it costs anywhere between 80 to 120 million euros to knock of one gm/km off a global auto company's overall CO2 rating. To ask the industry to bear the cost entirely would mean to make personal mobilisation far more expensive than it actually is. Go ahead and tell auto companies that they'd get a something point something percent excise duty benefit or complete waiver if they made a hybrid SUV or an electric one or something even cleaner. Encourage fuel saving and environment friendly technologies and the industry will be more than glad to work on it. Do all of that, Mr Ramesh to begin with, and I assure you that you will find your respect restored, in the eyes of many Indians, including myself.

Pages :| 1 
Advertisements
Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
Invest in Real Estate. Villas in Bangalore starting @ Rs.66 lacs
One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Email Print [17] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter    
blog comments powered by Disqus
  Posted by Suvin S at 1st December,2010
Yups, dont agree with the author at all. For me, Jairam Ramesh is making all sense. As said by someone here, its really offensive to see a big suv on the road with just one person behind the wheel and the vehicle occupying all the space on the road. I strongly agree with Jairam Ramesh to cut all subsidy on diesel for pvt vehicles/pvt firms (using diesel to run their generators) and pass on the benefits to the needy.
  Posted by sandy at 30th November,2010
Rameshji is right, we urban r unnecessary wasting our resources. 80% of 4wheelers plying on city roads carries 1 or 2 occupants, which can b done with 2wheelers/public transport, they can save time,space,energy and co2 emission. Necessity was father of Invention, but now a days we had made Invention as the father of Necessity and blending ourselves towards that, but this is not fair if it costs our atmosphere,resources,economy and even infrastructure.
  Posted by nik at 30th November,2010
oh my goodness; our politicians jairam here, traveling in his 'insulated from the outside world' cars, living in their fancy government subsidised homes; do you have any idea the kind of polluting mess smaller cities are from autorickshaws and trucks running on blackmarketed kerosene???? go plug that first; no you wont because you politicians have a big pie of the loot.shame on you and your ingnorance jairam.
  Posted by alok at 28th November,2010
why ramesh et akl are subsidizing LPG for rich and middle class and why 90% subsidized kerosine is fueling a rich person's equipments. Correct the basics first that why there is cooking fuel subsidy on 24 billion kg LPG/SKO increasing by 10% a year when green solar passive infinite energy is free and induction electricity is 4 times cheaper than market value of LPG/SKO at consumer's doorstep.
  Posted by partha at 27th November,2010
Exactly SUV owners should be made to pay the real price of diesel, and they should not be subsidised by the owners of small petrol cars paying more for petrol, if the subsidy is removed then diesel will be more expensive than petrol. Secondly due to the large size they cause congestion in the city. This is true for large sedans as well. I really would like a car the size of a reva with a small petrol engine. Anything larger than that tax heavily if they enter the city limits (congestion tax)
  Posted by Harsh Mohan Singh Advocate at 21st November,2010
Here's a piece of my mind:- If I can buy a 22 lac + SUV, I can also pay Rs.55-60 per ltr. of fuel - be it petrol or diesel. I must not burn the subsidized diesel @ Rs.35/- which is a Criminal Waste as said by Jairam Ramesh. Diesel is subsidized to augment agri sector and not for filthy rich to put in their guzzlers. Better still, Govt should ban diesel SUVs to get 2 benefits:- low pollution, no misuse of diesel subsidized for agri.
  Posted by Doc at 17th November,2010
Rohin, What are you cribbing about man? You say that people buy high-end SUVs because our roads are bad?? They all suffer from the "mine is bigger than yours" syndrome. Although BSM is not the right forum to say this and I love cars too, what we need is better public transport and discouraging private car ownership in general..those who wish to indulge their craze to burn rubber should be made to pay for it...scrap the current excise concessions too! As long as we have guys like Ramesh, there is SOME hope for our peculiar country! Doc
  Posted by Achu at 17th November,2010
BMW is following BS7 to regulate pollution, even though, in India the regulation is only BS3. How could he made this senseless statement? Good work Mr. Robin
  Posted by Suhas at 16th November,2010
Sensible retort. Good one Rohin!
  Posted by Amit at 16th November,2010
I fully agree 100% to this observation. One point you omitted is that Mr. Ramesh convinently ignored that there is something such as BS3 and BS4 to regulate pollution which SUV manufacturer follow. If Mr. Ramesh need to tackel misuse of subsidised Diesel then he need to attack the Diesel Genset industry which does not have any pollution control norm like BS3 and BS4 and consume subsedized Diesel. Even among the vehicles the real culprits are decade old Diesel Ambys , loading Autos and LCV which belch out smoke and have poor fuel efficiency. It is not out of the place if I say 70% of government vehicles fall in this catagory.
  Posted by prasoon at 16th November,2010
Dude, attempted a nice thought but I do wonder how many of the family packed SUVs do you witness frequently and how many of these do you see on the patchy bumpy roads of rural India. It's still the jeeps, Sumos and Scorpios doing their bit there while the SUVs remain confined to the Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities. It sure is an aspirational product and can be done away with.
  Posted by ssaa at 16th November,2010
If I have understood Jairam's comments correctly, it was not against SUVs but SUVs on diesel which is a subsidised fuel for poor farmers(agricultural uses -Generator for pumps, tractor etc). This subsidy is now being consumed by SUV owners which can easily afford the petrol price if they can afford the SUV. Just to put things in context. Planning to buy a SUV myself as soon as I have the moolah..
  Posted by Suyash at 16th November,2010
If I have understood Jairam's comments correctly, it was not against SUVs but SUVs on diesel which is a subsidised fuel for poor farmers(agricultural uses -Generator for pumps, tractor etc). This subsidy is now being consumed by SUV owners which can easily afford the petrol price if they can afford the SUV.
  Posted by karthik at 16th November,2010
Talking of pot holed roads is nothing but a pathetic attempt at deflecting the blame. No one i know has ever bought an SUV because the roads demand it. They do so c'se they can afford it and aspects like environmental impacts are not in our subconcious while making these decisions. Sayin that this is how it has been in west and other developed nations is no responsible justification
  Posted by Rajasekhar at 16th November,2010
I believe the point that was made by the Minister, and a valid one at that, was the use of subsidised diesel by the SUVs whose owners can well afford to pay market rates for the diesel. And whatever you say my friend, it is a fact that SUV sales have soared only because the fuel comes cheap. Given a mileage of just around 5 km for a litre of diesel for an SUV, even for those with the deepest pockets it can hurt if they have to pay at market rates for the diesel. This, I believe, is the crux of the issue and the solution is dual pricing of diesel, for which a mechanism has to be worked out so that it does not encourage blackmarketing of diesel.
  Posted by Rohit at 16th November,2010
"It sure is an aspirational product and can be done away with": Sounds more like a leftist argument. Just leave it to the individual to decide.
  Posted by pavan at 15th November,2010
the author does not seem to understand the word " average indian". SUV's are possessed by the high and mighty, period.
Twitter
Follow BSMotoring on Twitter
Read Emailed Commented
Other Manufacturers Other Models
 
Explore BSMOTORING.COM
  Home   Cars   Bikes   Gallery   General   Resources   Explore Group Network
 Quick Comparisons
 Road Tests
 Motofocus
 Motorsports
 Destinations
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Photo Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Wallpaper
 Travel
 Blogs
 Magazine
 About us
 Archives
 Register
 Feedback
 Archives
 Subscribe to Magazine
 Advertise with us
 Contact Us
 Business-standard.com
 bshindi.com
 Archives
 Livemarkets
 smartportfolio II