Skoda Octavia RS vs Honda Civic - Civic unrest!
     Follow us on 
BS Motoring Web  
  Wednesday, May 23, 2012
 
HomeCarsBikesTravelGalleryBlogsMagazineWeb TVAbout us
  Tests    Reviews    News    Features    Motorsports    Motor shows    Classics    Quick Comparisons
 
Home Cars Road Test
Skoda Octavia RS vs Honda Civic - Civic unrest!
You know the Civic is good. But is it good enough to be the new performance king?
By : Shreenand Sadhale | Published : September 23, 2006 | Photos : Pablo Chaterji
Email Print [2] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter  
More Photos | Video
 

 

 

Even if you’ve been reasonably awake over the past few months, you would know that Civic is the new buzzword. Every auto mag cover has screamed its arrival, and if you’ve read any of them you would know that the car is as modern as tomorrow. You would also know that unlike David Beckham or the rest of England, the Honda Civic actually lives up to the hype. And that it’s better than anything around. Yet, to stay true to the ‘first drive-road test-comparo’ routine, it’s inevitable that a shoot-out follows. The competitor too is inevitable.

To be honest, we too thought of bringing the Corolla alongside the Honda, but frankly it’s a bit of a foregone conclusion. Though that’s not to say that we won’t be doing the story – it’s just that we wanted to have some fun with the Civic. After all, this car’s got paddle shifts and that alone is enough reason to celebrate. So we called up Skoda and got an RS. And then we PET-ed them.

The PET, or Performance Evaluation Test as BSM regulars would know, isn’t a race. It’s a one-km course that is specifically designed to bring out the best in terms of acceleration, braking, handling and tyre performance. And even the worst. To begin with, you accelerate as hard as you can from the start, followed by a lane change manoeuvre, before coming to a dead stop (braking as late as possible). A U-turn leads to the slalom (entry speed 60 kph), that’s followed by a 360-degree skid-pad simulator, leading to the start-finish line.  Both cars are given an independent run, so for the record, the lead picture is for ‘photographic purposes only’.

Now, you would think that a 1799cc, 132 bhp automatic Civic would have no hope in hell against a 150 bhp turbo petrol Octy. And you are right. Except that the Civic was over a second quicker in the PET. Surprised? We weren’t. Shocked is more like it. And so we did it again, thrice, with a different driver too! The result was the same every single time. So then, has the new Civic conquered the final frontier by beating India’s only performance car? Well, not quite.
Pages :| 1 | 2 | 3 
More Photos:
   
Advertisements
Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
Invest in Real Estate. Villas in Bangalore starting @ Rs.66 lacs
One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Email Print [2] Comment   Facebook Facebook   Add to Favorites Twitter    
blog comments powered by Disqus
  Posted by Rohith Poorun at 6th February,2011
I think you should have compared civic type R with the skoda RS.it would have been a better match!Although we don't have the skoda in South Africa,it looks old! But nice review!
  Posted by dhoom machale at 15th October,2009
very very nice articAL
Twitter
Follow BSMotoring on Twitter
Read Emailed Commented
Other Manufacturers Other Models
 
Explore BSMOTORING.COM
  Home   Cars   Bikes   Gallery   General   Resources   Explore Group Network
 Quick Comparisons
 Road Tests
 Motofocus
 Motorsports
 Destinations
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Photo Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Wallpaper
 Travel
 Blogs
 Magazine
 About us
 Archives
 Register
 Feedback
 Archives
 Subscribe to Magazine
 Advertise with us
 Contact Us
 Business-standard.com
 bshindi.com
 Archives
 Livemarkets
 smartportfolio II