Audi A6 vs Mercedes-Benz W212 E-Class | BS Motoring
Login Login Go Forgot
password
register
bsm web Search
HomeCarsBikesTravelGalleryBlogsMagazineWeb TVAbout us
  Quick Comparisons  |  Road Tests  |  Motofocus  |  Motorsports  |  Destinations
BSM Home
  You are here: Home > Storypage
  

E-nter the dragon

By:Rohin Nagrani |Published :November 14, 2009
Bookmark and Share       [3] Comments  | Add  
Compare Audi A6 vs Mercedes-Benz W212 E-Class
More Photos | Video

 Every time the big three in the luxury car space bring out a new car, it is immediately subject to incremental improvements. For Mercedes-Benz, these increments were becoming a problem. Over the last decade, the W210 and W211 E-Class were incrementally better than their predecessors on paper. But reality seemed to deliver it a nasty blow. Electronic gremlins, reliability issues and what not were driving the three-pointed star into the red quicker than their association with Chrysler. Build quality too was suffering and every time JD Power & Associates would release a report, the chief quality officer at Mercedes-Benz in Sindelfingen probably sent the document to his computer’s Recycle Bin. Maybe, because he knew a secret that all of us weren’t aware of — the W212 E-Class!

There are numbers attached to this one too. Overall rigidity is up by 30 per cent, aerodynamic efficiency is improved to 0.26 Cd, making it the most aerodynamic saloon on sale, fuel efficiency has improved by up to 23 per cent and the list goes on. But ask the true blue E-Class fanatic and he will tell you that this is Mercedes-Benz’s way of saying, “We are back!” Quality improvements have been made, reliability is on the up, the E-Class is better loaded and specced than its competition and a distraction called Chrysler has been offloaded. It all sounds nice, except that Audi have been quietly chipping away at the heels of Merc all this while. And the A6 has been recently facelifted, while being offered with the gung-ho, 290 bhp 3.0-litre supercharged V6. To counter it, Mercedes-Benz have called on the best V6 in their arsenal — the 268 bhp 3.5-litre V6 from the S350 to take on the might of Ingolstadt. It’s time to roll up the cuffs!

For those familiar with the S-Class, this is the exact same engine block you will find on the larger sibling and is not the CGI, direct injection as one would have hoped it would be. Nevertheless, this is quite a jump from the erstwhile E280. Power is rated at 268 bhp@6000 rpm, up nearly 37 bhp from the 3.0-litre engined predecessor. Torque is also up, now rated at 35.4 kgm@2400-5000 rpm against the erstwhile E280’s 30.6 kgm@ 2500-4600 rpm. Mated to the 7G-tronic gearbox, the gearing has been tuned to deliver all the shove in the first five gears, with the sixth and seventh focused as overdriven gears. The longitudinally mounted engine, with its rear-wheel drive system, puts the car at a porky 1805 kg, up by 120 kg over the E280, but down by nearly 150 kg on the S-Class. So, how does that affect numbers?

Bookmark and Share      Top Pages :| 1 | 2 | 3 
Tags: Mercedes-Benz |  E350 |  Audi |  A6 |  3.0 TFSI |  JD Power & Associates |  W212 E-Class |  Chrysler |  BMW  
  
Advertisements
Only Developer to give a guarantee on time space & rate.
Now property search gets more exciting than ever before!
Making lives better through Social Innovation Business..
India's No. 1 Property Site. Click here to know more.
Health is Wealth..... Insurance + Savings... Know More...
More Photos:
   
Comment on this Article
Name:
Email:
 [3] Comments
Arvind
29th November,2009
Reply
The W212 represents Mercedes' return to core values. It feels very well built and its ride and handling balance is sublime to say the least. True the BMW 5 series feels a bit more agile but has unforgiving pliancy as far as ride is concerned. I do not know if the Indian Audi comes with the S-line pack. If it does, the large alloys and hunkered down suspension harm the ride comfort just as well as they enhance the appearance. The F10 5 series would probably be a better enthusiast's car but the Mercedes' ride and handling balance would be difficult to match.
Steve
26th November,2009
Reply
Huh! if Merc is not selling the CGI engine in India then how the hell are you going to compare it.
Aditya
19th November,2009
Reply
This isn't an "apples to apples" comparison. Mercedes Benz's 3.5L V6 is tried and tested, but for the E-class, it has been retired for the most part. Mercedes Benz is moving to a CGI BlueEfficiency 3.5 V6 engine in the C350 CGI, which is what should have been used for this comparison. It outputs about 292hp and has the same Startified direct injection as Audi's FSI, used in this comparison. Engine technology is changing rapidly and it would only be fair to allow Mercedes-Benz to use their latest technology too. However, I would say, the Audi's signature is its understated elegance. It is not a flashy car - not too many gimmicks up its sleeve (like night view assist), but at the same time it offers almost the same comfort levels (if not more) as a BMW or Mercedes. And as for Quattro, there is nothing available today that can give you the same amount of confidence when you stick a car in a bend or drive on slippery roads. I think the outcome is good for Mercedes-Benz, their car surpas
Twitter
Follow BSMotoring on Twitter
Most Popular
Read Emailed Commented
Other Manufacturers Other Models
Explore BSMOTORING.COM
  Home   Cars   Bikes   Gallery   General   Resources   Explore Group Network
 Quick Comparisons
 Road Tests
 Motofocus
 Motorsports
 Destinations
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Tests
 Reviews
 News
 Features
 Motorsports
 Motor shows
 Classics
 Quick Comparisons
 Photo Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Wallpaper
 Travel
 Blogs
 Magazine
 About us
 Archives
 Register
 Feedback
 Archives
 Subscribe to Magazine
 Advertise with us
 Contact Us
 Business-standard.com
 bshindi.com
 Archives
 Livemarkets
 smartportfolio II