Email this Page's link Print This Page

So who's driving?

21 Feb '08
Text: Srinivas Krishnan
Photos: Aman Chaudhry

Which one's better to pilot, the new SX4 or the Fiesta 1.6?

So who's driving?

As it sometimes happens, we drew almost simultaneously out of the toll both and glanced at each other. The road in front of us was empty at that time of the day. No words were required, but Shreenand, who was in the driver's seat of the Suzuki SX4, grinned and said '140'. A slight nod of my head indicated yes. After duelling with both cars since daybreak, dragging them was the last and perfect thing that we could have done.

Aman did the 3-2-1-GO! countdown and Nandu whipped the SX4 for all its worth. I was a bit slower in the Fiesta 1.6, but man, that Ford gave all that it got. By around 100 kph, it drew closer to the SX4 and was not more than half a car length behind. I could hear the already noisy Suzuki engine sing at a fever pitch and try to pull the rest of the car further. The Fiesta returned the favour and kept that half-car length margin intact. But it was clear, the SX4 would maintain its lead, reaching the 140 kph mark well before the Fiesta did.

We slowed down, grinned at each other like schoolboys doing something naughty without getting caught, and drove on towards a late but well-deserved lunch break.

I knew even before we did that impromptu drag that the Fiesta would find it hard to match the SX4. Look at those test figures, it comprehensively beats the Fiesta 1.6 in the performance timings. You may say that the SX4's larger shoes are making a huge difference, but is that the Suzuki's fault? It's not as if wearing 16" rubber is equivalent to taking some anabolic steroids, right? So it's all settled then, the SX4 is way quicker and is the driver's car. Let's finish the story here and grab a short nap then.

 Ha, life is never so simple. So let's first finish off with the car buying decision first, because buying a car is usually more than which is the driver's car (So why have we done this story in the first place then? Because we are BSM, that's why). Anyway, to answer the question on which is the car to buy between the SX4 and the Fiesta 1.6, it's a no-brainer. The SX4 is cheaper (if you don't opt for the leather option in the ZXi), comprehensively equipped, does almost everything right in almost all departments and is engineered to be more practical and user friendly. For instance, just ask some aged folks to get in and get out of both cars, and they will give their vote to the Suzuki. Seriously, Maruti Suzuki have a very good car in their hands that is accomplished in all aspects and is great value for money too. And on the other hand, over 80 per cent of Fiesta sales are for the diesel, and the 1.6 is not exactly a big seller for Ford anyway. So why are we comparing these two cars then? As I mentioned before, we are BSM, that's why. Let's continue with the drive, shall we?

We started the day very early, in an attempt to put as many kilometres as possible in both cars. The route that we drew up included two-lane stretches of national highways, narrow small-town roads, brilliant curves, and of course, the ubiquitous Mumbai-Pune Expressway... oh, and the crowded Mumbai roads too.

I am well settled in the SX4, though it took some time to arrive at my optimum position. The first time I sat in it, it felt as if it was an SUV and it took a while to get used to the tall seating, the incredible A-pillar treatment and the vast dash. Once I arrived at my optimum settings however, it's all friendly, familiar and comfortable – though the position is a bit too MPV-ish for me (when your benchmark is the previous generation Honda City's stretched-out, go-kart like position, nothing comes close, right?). 

The engine in the SX4 comes from a new family of motors that Suzuki has developed. I am a little worried. Where is the refinement? Where is the silken smooth whisper? Why does it sound as if all the valves need to work out the stress? Displacing 1586cc, this unSuzuki-like inline-four with a 16-valve DOHC treatment develops 102 bhp at 5500 revs and 14.5 kgm of torque at 4200 rpm. It is adequate for the SX4 and, as the figures show, does a good job of making it sufficiently quick as well – but not quick enough to worry the City VTEC.

The Fiesta's 1.6 four-cylinder mill also has 16 valves doing the breathing, but it does not sound as stressed as the SX4's. Displacing 1596cc, it develops a marginally less 100 bhp at 6500 revs and similar torque, but at an approachable 3400 revs. What I liked best about the Fiesta's motor is that at any given point, it is always ready to go. The SX4 engine, on the other hand, is dead at low revs, nothing much happens almost till 2500 rpm. So much so that sometimes while you are in second gear, it actually balks till you rev her up some more. The action in the SX4 really happens well above 3000 and to keep the pace, you have to take the effort to keep it in the powerband. Though on the highway both are pretty well matched, in the city, I'd take the Fiesta any day.

 That's not all with the Fiesta. Both cars come with five-speed manual gearboxes and I felt the gearshifts in the Ford much more engaging and fun to slot the gears. The SX4's gearshifts are also firm and slot positively, but to me they were a bit too notchy to flick from gear to gear. The gearing in the SX4 is shorter to compensate for those bigger wheels, but it is good enough to make mincemeat of the Fiesta's speed timings.

Time now to leave the fast, straight roads and head to the twisties. It's payback time for the Fiesta. The car's chassis revels in the curves and the steering is so precise that you can place the car exactly where you want, while it provides the right amount of feedback. The seating position also helps over here, since you sit lower, you feel much more in control too. The whole package – the chassis, the suspension, the steering, the gear lever and the ever-ready engine – it all comes together for these roads. Ford has a brilliant small car engineering facility in the UK, and sure those guys do know their business and how to develop small cars. And it rides quite well too.

Compared to the Fiesta, the SX4 feels a little too light. Well, you cannot exactly dismiss the SX4's capabilities – it also takes on whatever the road throws at it and handles bad patches superbly, but it is hardly as involving as the Fiesta is. The tall seating position means you are not one with the car, while that A-pillar treatment means you are constantly peering more than necessary while taking those right-handers. The steering of the SX4 is the best EPS setup that Maruti Suzuki has given us so far, way better than anything else they have given us in the past, but that still doesn't mean it is brilliant. It is devoid of decent levels of feedback and lightens up at high speeds as well. The SX4 chassis though cannot be faulted – it's quite nimble and on sharp turns it almost seems to pivot on the gear lever's axis. Somewhat like what a rally car would do. Oh, come to think of it, the SX4 would have some rally genes in it for sure – Suzuki's engineering the hatchback version for taking part in WRC next year. Wonder how they are going to manage with that A-pillar, though... all the best, Suzuki.

So what do we have at the end of it then? The SX4 is way quicker but not as much fun to drive, but the Fiesta is a charmer. This is one of those heart versus mind things. The SX4 is the car to buy – it's practical, is a good family car, does everything well, etc, etc, etc. But when you hear the Fiesta's engine note and the muscular sound emerging from the exhaust, you tend to get selfish thoughts... Just remember not to drag it against the SX4, that's all.


Comments (29)

blue oval all da way..

Posted by adi dev on Thu, 21 February 2008 (permalink)
whn it comes to drivin..a ford is a ford...i hve an ikon 1.6 n a city vtec zx.. da ikon drives like da babe u can kill 4...while da vtec is a wannabe...same goes in da test above...by da way...which is faster between the ikon n fiesta??...leave da oders to carry families around

Strider!

Posted by Sreenath on Fri, 22 February 2008 (permalink)
For one, the numbers you speak of aren't given here in the website. Also, why don't you put in the slalom and skid pad (max g) figures to give us an idea of how good they handle? As for speed, roll on figures are a more practical application of the car's power/torque, how about those numbers?

Biased review

Posted by Gost Rider on Fri, 22 February 2008 (permalink)
I do not agree with the author that the sx4 is quicker. There is an odour of Fiesta baiting throughout the review, though he tried to make it up by bringing out a few of Fiesta's fortes.

Beleno is still the best

Posted by sudhir on Fri, 22 February 2008 (permalink)
Baleno is still the best of the three cars. The gearing is better in Baleno and the acceleration in the lower gears is far better than either Fiesta or SX4.

torque

Posted by Lavkesh Arora on Fri, 22 February 2008 (permalink)
There is no way on this earth a SX4 is gonna beat Fiesta in straightline performance.... or may be you didnt drag it right. I am game anyday, anytime.

Somewhat amateurish review

Posted by A Car & Driver Reader on Sat, 23 February 2008 (permalink)
Guys, I don't want to sound like a snob who reads C&D, R&T and Top Gear mag all the time...but your review leaves much to desire. After the 0-100 you are ready to declare the Driver's car verdict. I thought the Driver's car is the one that is fast, handles well, does not understeer and being FWD does not exhibit torque steer. I guess you guys don't need to test for all that. And yeah, why are all Indian reviewers trying to do 170-180 or even 220 kmph on public roads? Most western mags review the speed and handling tests on tracks. Maybe India does not have tracks to go to? How about these Car mags pool money to create a test track and then open it to public (500 Rs for 3 laps) to recover the costs and actually encourage people to flog their cars on track than on public roads?

Aakash

Posted by tippu on Sun, 24 February 2008 (permalink)
i am very much interested in ur magsine and i am brousing for extra info

MR

Posted by DROF on Sun, 24 February 2008 (permalink)
Go back and redo it with Ford PACE and SX4

Ha! Ha! Verna Petrol is still the quickest...

Posted by verna_rocker on Tue, 26 February 2008 (permalink)
Well I have driven both these cars and VERNA petrol....it is a Rocket, excellent well performing-noiseless engine, silky gearbox. Sales figure of Verna petrol has improved last 5-6 months. Jan 2008 3,800 Verna's were sold out of which 40% was Petrol. Now it is selling close to 1,300-1,400 per month. SX4 mileage is pathetic just 9-10kmpl. Verna in city drive after first service (1,200KM) easily gives 12+ with A/C. FORD A.S.S is horrible and expensive. SX4 looks big from outside but smaller inside, rear seat is very bouncy for passengers plus it is a four seater car. People reporting quality problems with SX4 - gearbox too noisy, car drifting towards right, door rattling etc. All the best drive safely!

Verna Petrol is better

Posted by simple_man on Thu, 28 February 2008 (permalink)
I too own Verna XXI petrol it a VFM and overall performing car and agree with Verna_Rocker. These kids Aman and Srinivas don’t know how to test drive a car but they are learning. In Delhi and Bangalore (where I travel frequently) I see so many Verna Petrol now. Technically (VTVT) & in terms of performance it is way ahead of SX4, it only suffers due to image (Indians like big and bulky cars). Body of Verna is very tightly coupled and gives confidence while driving. Heart and Soul of any car is the engine and gearbox and on both these fronts Verna scores 100% more compared to SX4 or Ford. For city driving (bumper-to-bumper) airbags or alloy wheels are not required. Only plus in SX4 is GC and bigger boot (if you need one) but I still need to figure out if it is CAR, SUV, MUV or Pregnant Frog :)

out of place

Posted by sanjay on Thu, 28 February 2008 (permalink)
Having driven both the cars on the westeren ghats, i feel the Ford was way ahead in terms of handling, the SX 4 in comparision was like asking a Hippo to do a Ball Dance. U guys have got the story wrong

Mr

Posted by Richard on Fri, 29 February 2008 (permalink)
I have been using Fiesta Petrol for last 15 months, Fiesta is not matched for SX4. Driving Fiesta is any time pleasure.

FORD means For On Road Delight

Posted by Manoj Majeed,Bangalore on Sat, 01 March 2008 (permalink)
In my book, FORD means 'For On Road Delight'.I've been abusing 1 for the last 8months or so,&she has delivered the goods each time i pushed her to the limits.S,I'm a safe driver:) Suzuki engineers can only dream of making a car which competes with 1 like Fiesta in terms of handling characteristics&needs to do a lot of catching up with their Ford counterparts.u've overlooked the fact dt Fiesta runs on a 175/65R 14,SX4 has a wider footprint in 205/60 R 16.Am dying hard 2 fit her with a 195once d current 1 is done with its DUTY.Srini,u hit the nail on D head when u say"The car's chassis revels in the curves and the steering is so precise tht u can place d car exactly where u want,while it provides the right amount of feedback".SX4 does not exude d kind of confidence for the 1 behind the wheel for its high stance&seating position.A F1 car cud take a 60degrees curve at even 200kmph whereas a land cruiser or even our Innova may not be able to do it @20kmph.So guys Go Fida with the Fiesta.

Correction

Posted by Manoj Majeed,Bangalore on Sat, 01 March 2008 (permalink)
Hi, The last sentence in the above piece of comment should read as "A F1 car cud take a 60degrees curve at even 200kmph whereas a land cruiser or even our Innova may not be able to do it @120kmph.... Thank you ... Happy Motoring !!!

Men are back to go fida with the Fiesta

Posted by Shyam Prasad , Bangalore on Sat, 01 March 2008 (permalink)
Hey Manoj,, So we Men are back to go fida with the Fiesta... by the way, Where have all the women gone ?? They've taken the SX4 for a stroll in the park .. :) ;)

Software Engg.

Posted by Joseph K on Sat, 01 March 2008 (permalink)
I had a good impression on BSM. But after reading this review, I am disappointed. Fiesta is miles ahead of SX4. I feel you still can't compare SX4 with Fiesta.

Telecom

Posted by Shyam Prasad on Mon, 03 March 2008 (permalink)
I think Ford Fiesta is really good becoz of its mileage and the way it hadles the ghat section curves. SX4 pinches your pocket bigtime becoz of its low mileage. We can pick SX4 only when your company is paying for your petrol Bill. SX4 is extremely comfortable and has classic looks. But i would go fida.

Rocking Sales by VERNA in Feb'08

Posted by verna_rocker on Tue, 04 March 2008 (permalink)
Another rocking month by VERNA…. Feb 2008 sale figures, Verna – 3,931 (1,474 petrol) SX4 – 1,784 City – 2,200 Fiesta – 2,048 (508 petrol) Aveo – 1,184 Indigo – 2,395 Logan – 2,439 (467 petrol) Well people might say Verna sale is due to Diesel, well then Ford, Tata and Logan all have Diesel variant and as per info I have Diesel Fiesta gives 1-1.5km more to Verna. This shows the overall reliability, high quality of Hyundai products be it petrol or diesel compared to competition. SX4 attracting people by adding more features - it scores below par as far engine performance/noise, gearbox performance, comfort, poor mileage etc. is concerned.

Surprsing!

Posted by Neville Shah on Mon, 10 March 2008 (permalink)
Simple_Man - Looks like you buy ur cars only to drive in bumper to bumper traffic, seriously coz to call safety features (not required) as rich as airbags, u must be really dumb. And alloys add to the handling of the car and improves the look. and if MUL can provide all the additional features above ur Verna at the same price, then it only shows shows how Hyundai is ripping the indian customer. And performance?????? don't even get there since i think by now everyone knows the truth about how Hyundai inflates the BHP figures on paper lol Verna_Rocker - get ur facts right before u shoot ur crap. And i think u urself have mentioned the Sx4 sales compared to the Verna petrol and i think that says it all as to which car the market thinks is better.

SX4 sales dropping due to poor quality

Posted by simple_man on Thu, 13 March 2008 (permalink)
Verna XI with VXI both doesn’t have airbags or alloy wheels and Verna is cheaper by 15K. Anyone doing 90% city driving these things not required. SX4 sales dropping last 3-4 months. SX4 engine is pathetic, lacks punch, sluggish pickup, noisy etc. Any car be made comfortable to handle by putting large Scorpio size wheels, this is no rocket science. Try zipping @ 60-80km/hr in city traffic and it is unstable/bouncy, toppling feel and body roll - in short scary. Verna gives 1kmpl more to SX4-confirmed on different forums. One has to make compromise with SX4 like rear seat comfort, cheap interiors, NOISY engine, noisy cabin with road noise transmitted inside, notchy gear box, overall poor MUL quality etc to name a few. Recently @ Thailand/Singapore saw 3-4 Verna everyday but no SX4 or few other Suzuki car. Did see 2 Swift in Singapore, few City ZX V-Tech. Engine noise will go up further after 20,000-25,000KM similar to SWIFT etc. Verna petrol is responsive and noiseless engine.

MUL needs to improve Quality

Posted by noidasx4car on Fri, 14 March 2008 (permalink)
Neville Shah you are missing the basic point here...In India whenever an option is available between petrol or diesel people go for diesel. Although it is proven number of times if u do less than 20,000km pa it will take you 5-6 yrs to breakeven. Resale of diesel is practically ZERO. Keeping this in mind if Verna is selling 1,300+ petrol per month a healthy number when compared to other manufacturers. Once SX4 comes with diesel this 1,700 figure will come below 1,300 but MUL doesn’t have a good diesel technology as seen in SWIFT. People only talk about ZXI not VXI, without features like alloy wheels, airbags this car is nothing, no power, no performance. This shows car doesn’t have its own inherit merits just external features to propel sales. Whereas Verna XI is a very good city & highway car with overall performance. MUL quality is BAD as my SX4 gearbox is giving lotsav problem last 2 months, noisy car and doors rattling. Mileage is 10.75kmpl and I expect it to drop with 100% A/C.

SX4 does the AirBags work??

Posted by delhidamunda on Sun, 16 March 2008 (permalink)
Recently I was at the NFC, Delhi Police Stn for my passport inquiry where I saw an accidental SX4 ZXi. Constable told me it had met with an accident previous night on mathura road near delhi-faridabad border. Front was badly damaged and looked like a high speed accident, sides and rear were ok, windscreen cracked on passenger side. I was told driver was not hurt badly but passenger was but not critical. I was looking inside the damage etc. then I realised this car has AirBags and it should have been activated in such type of accident but it didn’t. I asked the constable and the insurance guy who was sitting there but they did not see any balloons (airbags) in front of driver, passanger seat etc. This made me wonder the full world is going Ga-Ga about safety features of SX4, does it work?? To my surprise it didn’t….may be it only works at 150km or above but this is crazy. Next week my SX4 is due for servicing this is pain point #12 in my long list of problems I am facing with this car.

MUL giving wrong information

Posted by Sales_Figures on Mon, 17 March 2008 (permalink)
Maruti is good in fudging sales figures. It has reported in A3 segment (they only say SX4 but fact is it is SX4 and Esteem) they have sold 41,000 cars between April'07-Feb'08. Till Dec'07 MUL was selling 1,700-2,000 Esteem's pm. This makes it 9 months x 1,800 avg = 25,000 appox SX4. This clearly shows SX4 is not the leader, Honda CITY is #1; MUL #2 and Hyundai close #3 with 24,000 (appox 500 Accents sold every month).

So many SX4 bashers, all on one page

Posted by arajand on Sat, 22 March 2008 (permalink)
Whoa! From where did all the Fiesta lovers converge onto this page? The entire comments sections reads and sounds very suspicious!

Fiesta...Nothin Beats it

Posted by Amit on Sun, 23 March 2008 (permalink)
I own a Fiesta(fida edition) and nothin comes close to it...be it specs/engine rev/interiors...and if u just keep ur foot on the accelertor only one thing can stop u....Empty Tank!..This car is as fuel effecient as any honda cars...it gave me 14-15 avg on highway(delhi-agra,with ac on)and in city it slows to 11-12...which is quite decent.So, Go Fida Go Wild

VERNA - Rocking March 2008

Posted by delhidamunda on Tue, 01 April 2008 (permalink)
Another Rocking month for Verna, March 2008 sales – 5690 units ; out of this appox 500-600 are Accents; which leaves 5090 for VERNA. As per industry information 60-65% sale if of Diesel. This makes it 3300 Diesel and 1790 Petrol – indeed fantastic performance for high quality product. To cross-check these figures please visit www.hyundai.co.in

Sad news for MUL and SX4

Posted by Noida_SX4_Owner on Wed, 02 April 2008 (permalink)
This is indeed sad news for MUL and SX4 in general. Few months back difference between SX4 and Verna petrol was 1,000-900 now it is only 100. March is normally HOT month in terms of car sale. MUL managed to sell only 1,900 SX4 after taking out Dezire sale of 5,700.

Hyundai High on Quality "Worldwide"

Posted by Noida_SX4_Owner on Fri, 04 April 2008 (permalink)
Hyundai high on quality – says American, European and Japanese car markets. Http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/ www/news/nation/2008/03/123_20616.html

SX4

Posted by prabjot on Thu, 24 July 2008 (permalink)
no sx4 is stil avalues piece of spacious and niche looking car

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard Motoring, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.
Top
Careers at BSM Blog at BS Motoring WhichCar? Visit the BSM archives 1999-2006 Join the BSM Yamaha R15 Club

On Stands Now

September 2008
September 2008